Many programs run delivery, grading, proctoring and credentials in four separate tools. Each one works. The trouble starts when a candidate appeals and the record lives in four places.
How the two setups compare
The same needs, met two ways.
| Need | Stitched tools | Exampit |
|---|---|---|
| Answering an appeal | Records requested from each vendor by email | Item version, accommodation, recording and score on one record |
| Accommodations | Set separately in each tool, often by hand | Set once per candidate and applied in delivery, proctoring and grading |
| Item statistics | Exported and joined in a spreadsheet | Difficulty, discrimination and reliability within one business day |
| Proctoring flags | Reviewed in the proctoring tool, apart from the score | Reviewed by a trained person within two business days, on the score record |
| Credentials | Issued by hand from a pass list | Open Badges 3.0 issued when a score is released, with expiry tracked |
| Sign-in | A separate login for each tool | One sign-on through SAML 2.0 or OpenID Connect |
| Contracts | Three or four, each with its own renewal date | One fixed-fee, itemized proposal |
| Leaving | Several exports in different formats | One export of items as QTI and results as CSV; our copies deleted within 30 days |
When separate tools are fine
We will tell you if your current setup is enough.
Low-stakes quizzes
Practice tests inside a course, where no credential or hiring decision rides on the score.
One job only
You need one function, such as grading for a single course, and nothing more.
Contracts mid-term
Your current contracts run another two years; plan the move for renewal.
Connections already built
Your IT team maintains the links, and the exports reconcile without hand work.
Then take one product
Every Exampit product works alone, so you can replace one tool and keep the rest.
Compare both on your exam
Bring your current tools and one recent appeal; we will walk through both setups.