A flawed item costs more after a window than before it: a candidate appeal, a rescore, a form pulled. Run each draft through these checks while it is still a draft.

Does the item belong here?

Content checks, done by a subject matter expert who did not write the item.

  • Matches the blueprint

    Tagged to one domain and task, at the thinking level the blueprint sets.

  • One defensible key

    Exactly one best answer, confirmed by a second expert against a cited reference.

  • Important, not trivial

    Tests what a competent practitioner needs on the job, not a footnote or a date.

  • Current and sourced

    The reference and its edition are recorded, and no rule behind the item has changed since.

  • Stands alone

    Neither gives away nor depends on the answer to another item on the form.

Can every candidate read it?

Clarity checks, so the item measures the skill and not the wording.

  • Stem asks the question

    Cover the options: a candidate who knows the content can answer from the stem alone.

  • Positive wording

    Avoid NOT and EXCEPT; if one is essential, set it in bold capitals.

  • Parallel options

    Options match in length, grammar and form, and the key is not the longest.

  • Plausible distractors

    Each wrong option reflects a real mistake; three good options beat four with filler.

  • No catch-all options

    Drop “all of the above” and “none of the above”; they reward test-taking tricks.

  • Fewest words needed

    Cut background that does not change the answer; keep the reading load to the task.

Is it fair to every group?

Bias checks, done by a reviewer trained for it, with a second look after the window.

  • No insider references

    No regional slang, sports, holidays or cultural knowledge from outside the field.

  • Varied, respectful people

    Names and roles in scenarios drawn from varied backgrounds, with no stereotyped roles.

  • Sensitive topics justified

    Distressing content appears only when the job itself requires handling it.

  • Statistics checked later

    After the window, items flagged for differential functioning go back to reviewers for a content look.

Can every candidate reach it?

Accessibility checks on the item itself, before it reaches the interface.

  • Images described

    Alt text carries the information needed to answer, without revealing the key.

  • Not color alone

    Charts and hotspots label their parts in words or patterns as well as color.

  • Keyboard tested

    Drag, hotspot and ordering items tried by keyboard and screen reader before approval.

  • Readable math

    Equations entered as MathML, never as pictures of equations.

One flawed item, then fixed

The draft stem read “Which of the following is not true about grounding?” Its key was the only option with a qualifier, and one distractor was partly correct. The fix: a positive stem asking the purpose of an equipment ground, one key checked against the code reference, and three distractors drawn from mistakes apprentices actually make.

Train your experts to this standard

An Item Writing Workshop from $5,500 trains your experts to write and review to these checks.