Read the evidence before deciding anything
Patterns in one exam’s data, reviewed calmly and reported to you.
- Length
- 3 weeks per exam
- Price, indicative
- From $3,500 per exam
An unusual pattern is a question, not a verdict. Fast answers can mean a strong candidate; similar answers can mean a shared study guide. We report what the data shows and how sure we are, and your misconduct process decides what happens next.
How the three weeks run
- Days 1 to 3
Scope and transfer
A call on what prompted the review, then responses, forms and flags transferred securely.
- Week 1
Analyze response times
Time on each item compared with its typical time, looking for answers too fast to read.
- Week 2
Check similarity and exposure
Answer similarity across candidate pairs, and an open web search for your items.
- Week 2
Review proctoring flags
Flags from the window rechecked by a trained reviewer against the session recording.
- Week 3
Report and readout
A written report with a confidence level for each finding, and a 60-minute call.
What you receive
- Who it is for
- Exam owners concerned about item exposure, collusion or proctoring gaps
- Format
- Remote analysis, with a 60-minute readout call
- A response-time analysis by item and by candidate ID
- Answer similarity results for candidate pairs, with the method stated
- An exposure log of web pages, forums and files where items appear
- A proctoring flag review with the reviewer’s notes
- A written report with confidence levels, ready for your misconduct process
- Recommendations on items to retire and forms to rotate
Is this the right program?
Right for you if
- Pass rates or score patterns changed without a clear reason
- Items may have appeared on a forum, a shared drive or a prep site
- A committee needs written evidence to weigh, not a hunch
Look elsewhere if
- You want us to name who cheated; we report patterns, your process decides
- The window had fewer than 100 candidates; patterns will be too thin to read
Example: a cybersecurity certificate’s spring window
A cybersecurity certification body with about 2,500 candidates a year sees its pass rate jump in one spring window. In three weeks the review finds 23 items posted on a paid prep forum, and short response times clustered on those items alone. The body retires the items, and its own panel weighs the response data under its published policy.
Integrity Review questions, answered
Will you tell us which candidates cheated?
No. We report patterns and how strong the evidence is, such as a pair of answer strings unlikely to match by chance. Whether a candidate broke a rule is a decision for your misconduct process, which should give the candidate a chance to respond. Our report is written as one input to that process.
Can you review an exam not delivered on Exampit?
Yes. We need item-level responses with time stamps, the forms used and any proctoring flags, exported as CSV from your current system. Without time stamps the response-time analysis is dropped and the fee is adjusted. The exposure search and similarity analysis work with data from any delivery system.
What does the review cost?
From $3,500 per exam, covering one window and up to two forms; extra forms or windows are quoted as a fixed fee. Every price is on the pricing page. If the review points to gaps in delivery, remote proctoring adds record-and-review sessions from $6 each.
How is candidate data protected during the review?
Data moves over encrypted connections, is stored in the United States encrypted at rest, and is seen only by the analysts named in the proposal. The report uses candidate IDs, not names. When the review closes, we return or delete our copies within 30 days, as you choose.
Plan this program with us
A 30-minute call to see whether Integrity Review fits your teams, your calendar and your budget.